LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

ZNG  February 2002

ZNG February 2002

Subject:

Re: SRW test server up for playing with

From:

Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative

Date:

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:26:22 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (18 lines)

Alan Kent wrote:

>     Removed the responseSchema argument. I think we agreed to this.

I'm not clear what we agreed to. In our discussion there was sentiment that
there shouldn't be multiple response schemas, and even sentiment that there
shouldn't be any response schema.  So yes, it follows (in either case) that
there shouldn't be a response schema parameter in the request.

But the question of response schema is orthogonal to the question of whether
the response can take different forms at the request of the client (in other
words, we can model that with zero, one, or several schemas).

So aside from how we do it, my question is: are we still interested in
supporting thin clients and Explain, or are these no longer requirements?

--Ray

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager