>> If we reach the
>> end if that buffer, we need to diagnose this fact. As you can see, 38
>> and 23 are both misleading, since
>
> *nods*
>
> I don't see any reason to /not/ undeprecate it. (Is that a word?) :)
That was my feeling.
And I suggest the word "reprecate" :-)
_/|_ ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ I knew the world was going badly wrong when they started putting
"SKIP FLASH INTRO" buttons on ATMs.
|