Within the bibliographic and other domains, the index is identifier and ISBN
and ISSN are just examples of identifiers.  Within the authority domain,
ISSN is an attribute of Uniform title, i.e. for a title series.  ISBN would
be invalid in this context.  I'm not sure why in this domain there is not
identifier rather than the more specific ISSN but perhaps if Larry is
listening, he can explain.

Haven't yet had a chance to have a good look.  Thanks for this Mike,

Janifer Gatenby
Consultant OCLC PICA
Schipholweg 99
2300 AW Leiden, The Netherlands
+ 31 71 524 65 00
+ 31 71 522 31 19 (fax)
[log in to unmask]



-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Taylor [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 12 December 2003 11:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Bath Profile for SRW/CQL


Hi People,

I'd like to announce the first public draft of a Bath Profile for
SRW.  It's available at
        http://zing.z3950.org/cql/bath.html

Comments welcome.

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "Barry Potter is Barry Potter ... and therefore, Barry Potter
         is whatever" -- Phil Gray.

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/