> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:06:05 +0000
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
> Are we going to leave the URI for the dc 'index' set alone, even though
> it's got 'indexes' in it and we no longer talk about index sets?
> I suggest:
> (Or context-sets if preferred. Either way, it should point at the
Since we're already committed to v1.1 not being backward-compatible
with 1.0, I agree with Rob that we should take this opportunity to fix
the context sets' identifier URIs. We won't have this opportunity
again, since 1.2ff must be on-the-wire compatible with 1.1.
> I believe that Mike is working on the bath profile mapping.
Yes. I hope you all have bated breath :-)
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "Things like xmlrpc, soap and the stuff on top of them are
designed to 'interwork through firewalls'. A better phrase
would be 'go through the firewall like a knife through butter
in a way that prevents the companies involved monitoring
the activity'" -- Alan Cox.
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at