> Rob -- Trying to distill your question, I think what you're asking is, is
> there a way to request that a result set be copied to another, new result
> set.

> I don't understand why this would be a candidate:
> >       srw.resultsetname=fish and srw.resultsetname=fish
> I don't think we ever came up with a way.

The resultset created by the above query is identical to
srw.resultSetName=fish.  Hence should the server be expected copy it or
not?

So really my question is:
If, after all operations on it have taken place, a result set is
identical to the original, should it be treated as a new result set?

Maybe this question is just irrelevant and implementation dependant as
you can never change a result set anyway? I'm not sure :)

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  telnet: nebmedes.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.                WWW: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I