LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

ZNG  June 2004

ZNG June 2004

Subject:

Re: Unserializable scan response

From:

"Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative

Date:

Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:38:05 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (58 lines)

> (Question: should that outrage be towards the 
> people who designed XML as a text language?  Probably not: it 
> should be towards those who generated and propagated the 
> doctrine that XML is suitable as a generic structured data 
> language.  And towards ourselves for not spotting the lie.)

We've always known this was a lie, that XML was not really designed as a
generic structured data language and doesn't do as much (arguably less)
than ASN.1/BER etc. etc., but then we've always known that betamax was
better than vhs...

Sometimes being right isn't enough...
 
> I don't think we should be quick to dismiss real cases just 
> because they don't seem like the kind of thing _we_ would 
> want to do. 

No - but in this particular case, I suspect if you went back to the
database owners and asked what this character is doing there, they'd
reply that it was a mistake and remove it from their end... So not worth
making a fuss about.

However, as per my follow up e-mail there may be cases (e.g. an index of
audio terms) when you might want binary data returned as terms. At
present I could use the extraTermData to do so. I'd favour mirroring the
approach we use for records (introducing elements for schema and packing
to the term element) for two reasons:

i) the general stylistic guide to use element rather than attribute
forms in SOAP
ii) it seems sensible to use similar mechanisms in similar situations.

Also just indicating that the term is base64 encoded is not quite
sufficient for the same reason that I called the modifier mimeEncoded
rather than base64Encoded in the Music Context set - which is ...

> I have only two 
> comments: first, that the relation modifier's name 
> "mimeEncoded" is ambiguous as it could refer either to Base64 
> or Quoted-Printable,

The music context set is in draft form, and I've not written all my
thoughts down yet (too many other things...)

The problem with having a base64Encoded modifier is that although I know
how to decode the data, I've no idea what the thing is I get once
decoded (is this a string with stange character in, an audio wave file,
a video, a jpg, a mpeg, an executable). My intent with mimeEncoded is
that it would include the various MIME headers as well as the data
itself e.g. something like:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 #xA Content-transfer-encoding:
base64 #xA Uo8ey785ffshvo78f4873vv87cbt0q63

(and luckily #xA is valid in XML 1.0)

Matthew

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager