Message:
[
First
|
Previous
Next
Last
]
By Topic:
By Author:
Font:
Proportional Font
LISTSERV Archives
ZNG Home
ZNG June 2004
Subject:
Re: CQL binary terms (was Scan)
From:
"Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative
Date:
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:51:10 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
> OK, sounds good to me. Is it just the obvious two-chars-per-byte > thing where "foo" is encoded as "666f6f"? Yep, so a 4-fold increase in size if using UTF-16 (as each of the two chars is two bytes). Matthew
Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink
Advanced Options
Log In
Get Password
Search Archives
Subscribe or Unsubscribe
ATOM RSS1 RSS2
LISTSERV.LOC.GOV