As a purely personal matter of opinion, and not at all reflecting the
position of the Library of Congress on this matter, I will share with you
the thought that struck me this morning, in the shower:
If information is relevant to the heading, it goes into a 670 field; if
it's not relevant to the heading, it goes into a 675 field.
To paraphrase Judy Kuhagen speaking about another NAR-related matter,
introducing yet another field and set of tagging into NAR production is
not cataloging simplification.
*****************************************************************************
* Anthony Franks *
* Library of Congress *
* [log in to unmask] *
* *
* A personal opinion not the official position of the Library of Congress *
******************************************************************************