In message <firstname.lastname@example.org> Michael Everson
wrote via [log in to unmask]:
> Komi-Zyrian is the real Komi (and should be called only Komi). Komi-Permyak
> is a different language.
That's exactly what my email said. Let's not just repeat ourselves on
this list: substantive comments are sought.
I assume, on the basis of that assesment, that the ISO 639 JAC would
approve the addition of Komi-Permyak if requested, if the request met
the criteria and supplied appropriate backup documentation?
John Clews, SESAME Computer Projects, 8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG
tel: +44 1423 888 432; fax: + 44 1423 889061;
Email: [log in to unmask]
Committee Chair of ISO/TC46/SC2: Conversion of Written Languages;
Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization;
Committee Member of CEN/TC304: Information and Communications
Technologies: European Localization Requirements
Committee Member of TS/1: Terminology (UK national member body of
Committee Member of the Foundation for Endangered Languages;
Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC2: Coded Character Sets