On Sun, 28 May 2000, John Clews wrote:
> Dear Rebecca
>
> 1. Is "nds" now passed?
Yes.
> 2. Is the entry for "Old Saxon" the same as for Low Saxon,
> or Low German, which would be allocated "nds"?
No, this was not included in the proposal. It is considered a separate
language (it uses the collective code for Germanic, Other).
> 3. Will the following in the recent updates at LC remain as it is,
> or will it be changed?
Remain as is.
> <dt><b>Old Saxon</b>
> </dt><dd>
> <dl compact>
> <dt><i>Assigned collective code </i>
> <b>[gem]</b>
> </dt><dd>(Germanic (Other))</dd>
> </dl>
>
> I look forward to information on this point.
>
> Best regards
>
> John Clews
>
> --
> John Clews, SESAME Computer Projects, 8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG
> tel: +44 1423 888 432; fax: + 44 1423 889061;
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
> Committee Chair of ISO/TC46/SC2: Conversion of Written Languages;
> Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization;
> Committee Member of CEN/TC304: Information and Communications
> Technologies: European Localization Requirements
> Committee Member of TS/1: Terminology (UK national member body of
> ISO/TC37: Terminology)
> Committee Member of the Foundation for Endangered Languages;
> Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC2: Coded Character Sets
>
|