LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for NLS-REPORTS Archives


NLS-REPORTS Archives

NLS-REPORTS Archives


NLS-REPORTS@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NLS-REPORTS Home

NLS-REPORTS Home

NLS-REPORTS  July 2000

NLS-REPORTS July 2000

Subject:

Network Bulletin No. 00-37

From:

National Library Service for the Blind <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

NLS Documents for Network Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:22:10 -0400

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (275 lines)

Network Bulletin No. 00-37

Date: July 28, 2000

Subject: Collection Development

Index term: National Advisory Group on Collection Building
Ativities--2000 recommendations and NLS responses


Enclosed is a copy of the responses to the recommendations
made by the National Advisory Group on Collection Building
Activities at the meeting May 24-26, 2000.

Enclosure

For further information contact:

James Herndon
Head
Collection Development Section



____________________________________________________________

National Advisory Group on Collection Building Activities,
May 24-26, 2000.

1.  The Committee recommends NLS provide background and
statistical information, in appropriate formats, to the
National Advisory Group prior to the annual meeting,
including readership by age and disability, collection
distribution by genre, and magazine subscription statistics.


Response: NLS will provide this information beginning with
the 2001 meeting.

2.  The Committee recommends NLS give priority to
identifying and deleting obsolete, dated materials, and to
encourage network librarians to assist in the identification
process.  The Committee further recommends that NLS archive
and maintain a master collection of these materials for
patrons needing them for reference/research.

Response: This will be done as part of NLS's effort to
determine which titles are to be converted to a digital
format.  NLS is currently looking at ways to involve the
network of cooperating libraries in this process.

3.  The Committee recommends that random tests be performed
on the finished cassettes to determine their sound quality
as played on an NLS player including higher volume levels.

Response: Currently every cassette soundtrack is reviewed
for sound quality by playing each control copy cassette on a
C-1 unit at normal listening levels.  Increasing playback
levels will only exceed the C-1 player's capability of
providing undistorted sound.  We will continue to test
cassettes to specified requirements at normal volumes.  Any
change in machine and cassette design to play with
consistent undistorted quality at high volumes is beyond the
resources of NLS and would significantly increase the cost
of the program.

4. The Committee recommends NLS develop and conduct a study
to quantify the changing composition of the patron
population and potential population served by NLS and its
impact on network services.

Response: NLS is currently working with the North American
Region of the World Blind Union, the Bureau of the Census,
and other organizations to identify a process by which
population numbers can be estimated accurately.

5.  The Committee recommends NLS continue to work with the
Library of Congress administration to develop a mechanism
for purchasing materials from out-of-print book vendors to
fill in collection gaps.

Response: NLS will continue its efforts to acquire out-of-
print books in the most timely manner.

6.  The Committee strongly recommends NLS Specification 300
be amended to include the spelling of the authors' full
name(s) at the beginning of each recorded book.  This would
provide consumer parity, clarification, and facilitation of
additional bibliographic exploration.

Response: This recommendation was submitted and discussed at
the June 16, 2000, meeting of the NLS Engineering Change
Control Board.  After significant discussion, the consensus
of the Board was that although the spelling of the authors'
names at the beginning of each recorded book would be
helpful for some readers, it would probably be considered an
intrusion by other readers who expect an uninterrupted flow
of narration.  For example, patrons who read only authors
they are familiar with could well consider the spelling of
the author's name at the beginning of every title a
condescending intrusion, and they would probably complain
about this change.  Thus, based on the recommendation of the
National Advisory Group, NLS will change specification 300
to spell the authors' names as part of the closing
announcement.  By placing the spelling at the end of the
book, beginning announcements will continue to be narrated
without interruption, while the spelling of authors' names
will be available for interested readers.

7.  The Committee recommends subject bibliographies be
compiled with an eye to currency and relevance of materials.


Response: New titles are listed in Talking Book Topics and
Braille Book Review and then in the annual cumulations of
these publications.  Older titles are included in subject
bibliographies in an attempt to bring them to the attention
of readers who might not have been using the service when
the titles were listed originally.  Given the limited number
of titles available in this program it is not perceived as
reasonable to deny readers access to information about all
titles available in any given subject area.

8.  The Committee recommends that the subject/major catalogs
produced by NLS be provided on computer disk in addition to
the current formats.

Response: At the present time available funds will not
permit such an action.  However, this will be considered,
when funds are available.

9.  The Committee recommends NLS give priority to producing
new subject catalogs for bestsellers and biographies.

Response: The priority for subjects of bibliographies is
determined through a network survey.  When the next survey
is conducted, the Committee's recommendation will be cited.

10.  The Committee recommends NLS develop and conduct a
survey for patrons regarding magazine selection for the NLS
program which will determine consumer needs.

Response: In 1996 NLS conducted an extensive survey of
patrons' reading interests in the magazine area through a
nationally known public opinion research firm.  Surveys were
sent to  3,500 users of the NLS program.  Responses to the
survey indicated patron magazine preferences in various
subject areas.  NLS then assembled a magazine advisory
committee of users and network librarians to select specific
magazines in each of the subject areas chosen.  Changes in
the magazine list were made in 1998.  Given the cost and
complexity of the survey, NLS cannot repeat it frequently.
We do, however, periodically review the selection of
magazine titles to insure that the magazine list remains up
to date.

11.  Since the primary focus of Stereo Review has shifted to
items of a more technical nature, the Committee recommends
NLS continue to search for a magazine that contains more
reviews and articles about classical, popular, and country
music.

Response: Replacing an existing magazine with another
magazine is a change of sufficient consequence as to require
a magazine survey, similar to the one conducted in 1996.
(See response to #10 above).  Since that time, the NLS
magazine committee conducted an interim review of possible
replacements for Stereo Review, and turned up no magazine of
sufficient scope that could be offered as its replacement.
Although the NLS magazine committee identified magazines of
specific music types (classical, country and western, rock
and roll, opera, etc), there was no all-round, general-
interest music magazine that we found acceptable.  At this
time NLS plans no changes in the magazine list, but will
continue to share the recommendations and concerns of the
National Advisory Group in future meetings of the NLS
magazine committee.

12.  The Committee recommends NLS add the magazine Teen
People to bridge the gap between Stone Soup and Seventeenwhich will
provide current information not typically available in book format.

Response: NLS is now producing as many magazines as the
magazine budget allows.  The addition of a new magazine can
be effected only by dropping some other magazine currently
on the NLS magazine list.  Changes of this magnitude require
a survey of the subscribers affected, especially the
subscribers of any magazine that NLS wants to cancel.  The
current magazine list was finalized as a result of the 1996
magazine survey (see response to #10 above); we believe it
represents a consensus and that the majority of magazine
subscribers are satisfied.  However, because of the apparent
popularity of Teen People as a new magazine, it will be kept
in mind as a possible candidate for the magazine program and
will figure in future meetings and surveys of the magazine
committee.

13.  The Committee recommends that the copy allotment screen
be redesigned to put juvenile and YA materials together and
to include the modified Dewey code for juvenile materials.

Response: NLS is now looking into this change as a future
enhancement to the Production Information Control System
(PICS) copy allotment screen.  The change will include the
addition of more subject categories for both juvenile and
adult titles as well as enhancements to the bibliographic
information made available for download.

14.  The Committee encourages network libraries and radio
reading services to work collaboratively to provide local
materials to registered readers.

Response: As this service is not part of NLS, network
participation cannot be required.  However, radio reading
services do complement talking-book services, and NLS does
encourage network library cooperation.

The Committee commends the Head of the Collection
Development Section, Jim Herndon, and the staff for their
excellent facilitation of this meeting, including travel
arrangements, hotel accommodations, arranging for food and
transportation.

Response: Thank you.

The Committee commends NLS on providing access to the
collection through Web-BLND and Web-Braille.

Response: Thank you.

The Committee commends NLS on the availability and
usefulness of the copy allotment process on the World Wide
Web.

Response: Thank you.

The Committee commends NLS for its excellent work in
building its collection of classics and contemporary
literary work and continuing to develop the breadth and
depth of these collections.

Response: Thank you.

The Committee commends NLS for the increase in production of
Spanish titles from 25 to 50, and on the production of
bilingual materials.

Response: Thank you.

The Committee commends the Collection Development Section
for achieving diversity and balance in its holdings while
working within the constraints of the program budget.

Response: Thank you.

The Committee commends the Collection Development Section
for its restrained selection in recent years of debut or
experimental fiction.

Response: Thank you.

The Committee commends NLS for adopting the new, beautiful,
artistic, and durable book covers for print braille
materials.

Response: Thank you.

The Committee thanks chairman, Mike Duke, and secretary,
Maggie Bacon, for their leadership and hard work on this
committee.

Response: NLS also thanks Chairman Mike Duke, Secretary
Maggie Bacon, and the rest of the National Advisory Group
for their work, thoughtfulness, and cooperation.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager