There have been discussions about the issue of Bound withs in the MARC
Advisory Committee meetings, centered around how to represent in the
holdings format. See the following:
Proposal No. 99-02: Making Field 004 (Control Number for Related
Bibliographic Record) repeatable in the MARC Holdings Format
http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/marbi/1999/99-02.html
Rebecca
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^ Rebecca S. Guenther ^^
^^ Senior Networking and Standards Specialist ^^
^^ Network Development and MARC Standards Office ^^
^^ 1st and Independence Ave. SE ^^
^^ Library of Congress ^^
^^ Washington, DC 20540-4402 ^^
^^ (202) 707-5092 (voice) (202) 707-0115 (FAX) ^^
^^ [log in to unmask] ^^
^^ ^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:57:07 +0800
> From: wai-fung Cheung <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Different bib records linked to one item record
>
> Our library has some items in which different titles are bound together. Due
> to the nature of information in each title, we are going to create individual
> bib record for each of them. However, we are in a puzzle about the usage of
> tag 777 and the linkage among different titles as well as the physically
> bound item.
>
> Grateful if anyone can advise me the proper way to link different bib records
> to one item record? Is it a need to use any other tag to indicate the
> relationship? If possible, please quote me some examples and their MARC
> format (or inform us the OPAC web pages to locate relevant information) so
> that we can have a look of the matter in depth.
>
> Thanks for any information.
> Wai-fung Cheung
> Systems Librarian
> High Court Library
> Judiciary, Hong Kong
> [log in to unmask]
>
|