LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

ZNG  July 2001

ZNG July 2001

Subject:

RE: ÆFwd: RE: ZNG Draft Report for Final ReviewÅ

From:

Poul Henrik Jørgensen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative

Date:

Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:21:49 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

Hi Ray,

It is a good idea to put a link to the draft ZNG Namespace schema into the
report with an appropriate disclaimer as you suggest. 

The schema is only intended to clarify intentions in the draft report, since
I have no major disagreements with the existing proposal, but there are a
number of details that we need to address.

I have taken the following "liberties" in the namespace schema:

1) Added a ZNG namespace reference in order to facilitate future
developments and versioning.

2) Made most parameters optional, including the DatabaseName, which may in
some cases be implicit for a given host.

3) Added an optional RequestId parameter, that is returned along with the
corresponding response. This may facilitate thin clients and gateways -
especially if we use asyncronous transports.

4) Added the ResponseSchemaId and RecordSchemaId to the SearchResponse. This
may also facilitate future developments and make life easier for thin
clients.

Best regards,
Poul Henrik
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: ÆFwd: RE: ZNG Draft Report for Final ReviewÅ


Poul Henrik -- Thanks. (I've subscribed your other address now.)

Time's running short for me.  I won't have time to review the schema this
week.

Should I include a link to it in the report? If so should there be some
disclaimer, like, "it's only a draft, and it may not correspond exactly to
the
report, but we'll work out the discrepancies soon"?

I glanced at it and I can't tell if there is anything in the report that you
dissagree with. If so please tell me explicitly, and soon.

With regard to the result set issue, I'll leave it in, with some statement
that
if the server supplies it then that is some level of guarantee that results
will
be static. We can argue this further, later.

--Ray




-------- Original Message --------
From: Poul Henrik Jørgensen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: ZNG Draft Report for Final Review
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>,Janifer
Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>,Matthew
Dovey<[log in to unmask]>,"'William
E. Moen'" <[log in to unmask]>,"Stevens, Pat" <[log in to unmask]>,"'Poul Henrik
Jorgensen'" <[log in to unmask]>,"'Janifer Gatenby'"
<[log in to unmask]>,"'Bill
Moen'"<[log in to unmask]>,"'Sally McCallum'" <[log in to unmask]>, "'Cliff
Lynch'" <[log in to unmask]>,"Womble,Kelly" <[log in to unmask]>, "'Larry
Dixson'"
<[log in to unmask]>,"'Ralph Orlik'" <[log in to unmask]>, Mark Needleman
<[log in to unmask]>

Dear All,

Instead of posting a long prose document to clarify a number of issues
related to the draft ZNG report, I have prepared a draft namespace with an
XML XSD Schema which define proposed optional and required parameters:
  http://www.portia.dk/pubs/ZNG/ZngV1_xsd/ZngV1.htm

(beware of the hidden underscore between "ZngV1" and "xsd")

Please review and let me know, if there is something that you find unclear,
meaningless - or disagreeable.

Kind regards,
Poul Henrik

PS. The new ZNG listserver refuses my postings from this e-mail address,
which is the one, that I normally use.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 5:28 PM
To: LeVan,Ralph; Janifer Gatenby; Matthew Dovey; 'William E. Moen';
Stevens, Pat; 'Poul Henrik Jorgensen'; 'Janifer Gatenby'; 'Bill Moen';
'Sally McCallum'; 'Cliff Lynch'; Womble,Kelly; 'Larry Dixson'; 'Ralph
Orlik'; Mark Needleman
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: ZNG Draft Report for Final Review


I've revised the draft report, based on a few comments I've gotten. Attached
is
a draft for final review.  I would like to publish this report by Thursday
afternoon (I will be away all of next week, and possibly Friday).

If I don't hear further from anyone I'll assume the report is ok.  However I
need to know whether or not to list meeting participants, or organizations
only
(or neither).  And what about the timeline?

--Ray



--
Ray Denenberg
Library of Congress
[log in to unmask]
202-707-5795

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager