We have an ZNG-server without SOAP running in a very short time. It was also no problem to write an in a very short time a HTML-page serving as a ZNG-gateway. The root element of our response is searchRetrieveResponse.
The use of SOAP makes things more complex and it will certainly result in a higher implementation barrier. Maybe it is a stupid question but I am wondering now what is the added value of SOAP in this standard. I know it makes sense in case on none-ascii input.
Secondly to keep the implementation barrier low, isn't it a good idea to respond only with a SOAP envelop if the request was also embedded in SOAP?
The power of simplicity can be of great value to spread the use if ZNG.
Theo
>>> [log in to unmask] 30-10-01 21:54 >>>
FYI - this is still flakey in places and only handles the URL form at
present. Currently returns records in Yanks (Redsox ot whatever)
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antony Corfield
> Sent: 30 October 2001 17:05
>
>
> Our ZNGServlet can be found at the address below, using the type of
query
> shown. Attribute mapping can be specified as bib1.author or
openURL.author
> etc. Default is bib1.
>
>
http://jafer1.las.ox.ac.uk:8080/jaferWeb/ZNG?query=author+%3D+smith+AND+
ti
> tle+%3D+fish&startRecord=1&maxRecords=10
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Antony Corfield Java Developer JAFER Project
>
> mailto[[log in to unmask]] Libraries Automation
Service
> tel: +44 (01865) 284454 99 Banbury Rd
> fax: +44 (01865) 278275 Oxford OX2 6JX
> ______________________________________________________________________
|