Jerome McDonough schrieb:
> I agree that such a linking facility might be potentially useful.
> I also think that trying to determine what encoders mean when
> they link between different structmaps (and writing
> software to support that) raises a lot of nontrivial issues.
Yes, especially, when you think of links leading to other (maybe even
still not existing) METS files...
> So, on to the docket with this issue. We are not making
> any more substantive changes to the schema at this point,
> except for the addition of behaviorSec we discussed in
Sure - creating a new format is a lot of work and you'll always find
cases, whch won't fit exactly in the format. So I hope for the next
> Any enhancements discussed now go on the docket
> for Version 1.1.
That's okay with me. One last question: When will version 1.1 be
released? Is there any schedule?
Have a nice christmas