LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC Archives

ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC  January 2002

ISOJAC January 2002

Subject:

Granularity [Re: Language and dialect criteria (a) - (d)]

From:

John Clews <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:11:26 GMT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (90 lines)

In message <[log in to unmask]>
[log in to unmask] writes:

> I think that all of John's points are valid as "weighted arguments", but
> that all have problems.
>
> (a) "an established orthography" : This obviously does not apply to
> non-written languages. It also does not work for a large number of
> languages with no normalized orthography in the "European" sense.
> There may be orthographic principles with a lot of "individual
> freedom". There are also languages with competing orthographies, and
> even scripts. (And Chinese is a big problem in this respect.)

Which particular problems? Criteria (a) - (d) get around that.

> (I have a book in Serbian in Latin script; it is a dictionary, and
> the alphabetical order of the words in Latin script is that of the
> Cyrillic alphabet. The book states itself that it is in Serbian, and
> I don't think that we need to question that.)

Agreed - Serbian is rather well established as a language.

> Northern Sami has three distinctly different orthographies: "old
> orthography in Norway and Sweden", "old orthography in Finland", "new
> orthography". Actually, orthography/writing system/script will be a
> feature that needs "additional coding."

But orthography/writing system/script does not need to be coded as
language entities. ISO 15924: Codes for representation of names of
scripts, when published, will provide codes for these. It doesn't
have to be part of ISO 639, though it's extremely logical for
ISO 15924 to be used together _with_ ISO 639 just as
ISO 3166 is used together _with_ ISO 639.

> (c) "a separate language name" : This is an important point.
> However, it doesn't always work. There are many exceptions, e.g.:
> (1) Speakers of Northern Sami and Southern Sami both say that
> they speak Sami...

Covered in previous email.

> (2) Our Nigerian au pair gives the name of her town when asked
> which language she speaks.

Which seems to be common in much of Africa. However, using
geographical criteria applies everywhere anyway, though usually on a
larger scale: German is what is spoken in Germany, French is what is
spoken in France, English is what is spoken in England, etc :-)

> When "pushed" she says she speaks Yoruba, just a little differently
> from the people in the next town, who also speak Yoruba. Sometimes
> they understand each other, sometimes not.

Which is also true of varieties of English, even in the United
Kingdom, still if you go up various valleys, but despite considerable
degrees of mutual incomprehensibility in _spoken_ English, there is
nos significant incomprehensibility in _written_ English, except as
affected by illiteracy.

The question "what do you read?" is more significant than the
question "what do you speak?" in this instance. "What do you read?"
is what ISO 639 is largely about, though it also needs to consider
how it will interface with systems that deal with "what do you
speak?."

> This is actually not very different from the situation with the
> Nordic languages, just that we (for historical reasons) don't think
> of the "umbrella language" Nordic as a language.

Exactly. Sometimes it's the umbrellas which is more significant, and
sometimes it's what shelters under the umbrella. That's just the
nature of nomenclature and classification.

I still think that criteria (a) - (d) are pretty robust. Have you
some more borderline language entities to test against them?

Best regards

John Clews

--
John Clews,
Keytempo Limited (Information Management),
8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG
Email: [log in to unmask]
tel: +44 1423 888 432;

Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization;
Committee Member of ISO/TC37/SC2/WG1: Language Codes

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
January 2021
November 2020
June 2020
May 2019
February 2019
September 2018
April 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
May 2016
April 2016
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager