LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC Archives

ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC  January 2002

ISOJAC January 2002

Subject:

Walloon

From:

Havard Hjulstad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:40:08 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (229 lines)

Shouldn't this discussion be moved to the whole JAC list now, not just the
JACVOTE part?

I wouldn't mind postponing the inclusion of Walloon until we have a clearer
picture of the whole future language coding system.

There are obviously many types of language variations that are more or less
intelligible for users of other variants of the same language.

Norwegians speak Norwegian and Swedes speak Swedish and Danes speak Danish,
and they may very well do it together, understanding eachother. If someone
described this by saying that "Norwegian" is the Danish that is spoken in
Norway (or even "worse": "Norwegian" is the Swedish that is spoken in
Norway) I would say that this is completely wrong, and then I would think
about the historical and linguistic "facts" and say that this could have
been a correct way to describe the situation. The reason why it isn't
correct has nothing to do with language itself. Napoleon plays a more
important role. Random red lines on the maps created by wars and
international politics have given separate language identifiers to our
languages.

Apart from the important (and "impossible") discussion of what is a language
and what is a dialect and what is what kind of language variation I think
that the Walloon issue has two important questions:

(1) What is the usage (and sentiment) among Belgian authorities and
institutions and individuals? (I am sure that this isn't unambiguous.) Do
they speak the "Belgian variant of French called Walloon" or do they speak
the "Belgian language Walloon, which is very closesly related to French"?
Certainly, very few English speakers in the US speak "American". They speak
"English", sometimes called "American English". The users themselves are NOT
signalling to us that they "demand" that a new identifier be assigned for
"American". Aren't users of Walloon sending a different signal?

(2) Based on Christian's argument, is it logically correct to assign an
alpha-3 identifier, but not an alpha-2 identifier? I cannot see that his
arguments can be viewed differently in relation to 639-2. (And I am NOT
saying that Christian's arguments are invalid!)

Just an attempt to add to the confusion ...

Best regards,
Havard
-------------------------
Havard Hjulstad    mailto:[log in to unmask]
  Solfallsveien 31
  NO-1430  As, Norway
  tel: +47-64944233  &  +47-64963684
  mob: +47-90145563
  http://www.hjulstad.com/havard/
-------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: ISO JAC Voting Member List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Christian Galinski
Sent: 18. januar 2002 00:13
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [JACVOTE] AW: [JACVOTE] AW: [JACVOTE] Ballot: Walloon


May I reformulate my arguments:

I did not approve inclusion in ISO 639-1 for the following reasons:
If we include Walloon, we also have to include all kinds of variants for
major languages, like
enUS, enAU, enNZ, enUK etc.
deAT, deDE, deCH, etc.
not to mention Chinese, French, etc.

In specialized languages the nature of the communication barrier between
variants of a language is different from those in common language, where
strong dialects or other kinds of variants often makes them mutually
unintelligible. It is accepted by experts from most of the subject fields
that there are different administrative and legal traditions (e.g. between
the different English speaking countries, German Lander etc.) and even
scientific-technical development traditions (e.g. Danube hydroelectricity
technology), but experts would not claim this as being a different language.
I am not sure whether language policies, linguistic nationalism etc. is an
argument. On the other hand, we have cases, like Bosnian, Slowakian, etc. If
I am wrong, please correct me.

I have the strong feeling that, if we do not make our rules clearer also for
such cases, the 639-1 code will be filled up in a very short time and there
will not be many language identifiers left for big language communities with
emerging specialised languages and terminologies  - among others due to the
Internet.

I think we need to study this issue once again and possibly fine-tune or
redifine the requirements for languages to be included in ISO 639-1.

So I am not strictly opposed against the inclusion of Walloon in principle,
but would like to have the JAC policy made clear for this and similar cases.

Best regards
Christian


-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: ISO JAC Voting Member List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]Im Auftrag von
Rebecca S. Guenther
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Janner 2002 16:39
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: [JACVOTE] AW: [JACVOTE] Ballot: Walloon


Christian has voted no on adding an alpha-2 code for Walloon. According to
our rules, we have to conduct a second vote. On the second vote we need 5
yes votes for it to pass.

Could we discuss this please before deciding how to vote the second
time? What do others think?

Rebecca
>
>
>
>
> Submitter: see below
>
> PLEASE VOTE NO LATER THAN 16 Jan. 2002!
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ^^  Rebecca S. Guenther                                   ^^
> ^^  Chair, ISO 639/Joint Advisory Committee               ^^
> ^^  Network Development and MARC Standards Office         ^^
> ^^  1st and Independence Ave. SE                          ^^
> ^^  Library of Congress                                   ^^
> ^^  Washington, DC 20540-4402                             ^^
> ^^  (202) 707-5092 (voice)    (202) 707-0115 (FAX)        ^^
> ^^  [log in to unmask]                                          ^^
> ^^                                                        ^^
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Earlier message and original request:
>
> Date:         Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:40:09 -0500
>  Reply-To:     ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]>
>  Sender:       ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]>
>  From:         "Rebecca S. Guenther" <[log in to unmask]>
>  Subject:      Walloon
>  Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
>  Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
>
>  See attached request for Walloon. I have had numerous email conversations
>  with the requestors about this over the last several months. It was
>  initially not clear that Walloon might be considered a separate language
>  rather than a dialect of French. Now further consideration, especially by
>  the editors of Ethnologue, indicate that it could be given a language
>  code. From the various conversations and the evidence presented below,
>  there are plenty of documents to meet the criteria for establishing it.
>
>  Note that the request is for both a 639-1 and 639-2 code. The code chosen
>  for 639-2 is "wln", since "wal" is already taken (for Walamo). I will
> send out a ballot shortly.
>
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  ^^  Rebecca S. Guenther                                   ^^
>  ^^  Chair, ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee               ^^
>  ^^  Senior Networking and Standards Specialist            ^^
>  ^^  Library of Congress                                   ^^
>  ^^  Washington, DC 20540-4402                             ^^
>  ^^  (202) 707-5092 (voice)    (202) 707-0115 (FAX)        ^^
>  ^^  [log in to unmask]                                          ^^
>  ^^                                                        ^^
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>  Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:07:26 -0500
>  From: WWW generic account <[log in to unmask]>
>  To: [log in to unmask]
>  Subject: New ISO 639-2 code
>
>  This data was submitted on: Friday, December 7, 2001 at 16:07:26
>
>  lang_in_eng = Walloon
>  lang_in_fre = wallon
>  ref_where_found_1 = http://www.wallonie.com/wallang/
>  lang_in_vern = walon
>  ref_where_found_2 = http://www.wallonie.com/wallang/wal-wal.htm
>  trans_lit =
>
>  evidence = Conseil des Langues rigionales endoghnes: 44, Bd Liopold II,
> 1080 Bruxelles
>  Union culturelle wallonne: 71, rue du giniral De Gaulle; B-4000 Lndje
> (Lihge) (http://ucw.be.tf)
>  Sociiti de langue et de littirature wallonnes
> (http://users.skynet.be/sllw/)
>  Lhs Rhlns Namurwhs (http://relis-namurwes.be)
>  Li Ranteule,  165 ruwe di Lonziye, 5030 Djiblou
> (Gembloux) (http://aberteke.walon.org/)
>
>  Other web sites in Walloon
>  -------------------
>  - Translation of the Declaration of Human
> Rights: http://www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/frn1.htm
>  - Unix software localization (in
> Walloon) pages: http://users.skynet.be/bs302306/linux/ and
> http://www.ping.be/linux/walon/
>  - Monolingual dictionary: http://moti.walon.org/
>  - Online walloon grammar (in
> Walloon): http://users.skynet.be/croejhete/pi_cr/index.html
>  - Web site about all things Walloon: http://aberteke.walon.org
>  - Union culturelle wallonne - section of
> Namur: http://users.skynet.be/frn-ucw/index.htm
>  - Walloon satyrical magazine
> "Rabulets": http://chanae.stben.be/walon/rabulets/
>  - Walloon writer Josi
> Schoovaerts: http://www.angelfire.com/me/schoovlab/PINSEYES.html
>  - Walloon writer
> G. Puissant: http://biant.unige.ch/~puissant/WALLON/textewal.html
>  - Page on language standardization: http://rifondou.walon.org/
>  addinfo = - Official status: +Langue rigionale endoghne; in a decree
> voted in 1999 by the Parliament of the Communauti frangaise de Belgique
> (one of the  federal entities of the State of Belgium)
>  - Estimated number of speakers: 1,000,000 (see Lorint
> Hendschel: "Quelques indices pour se faire une idie de la vitaliti du
> wallon" in "Qui walon po dmwin", Quorum, 1999 (ISBN 2-87399-072-4)
>  - Where spoken: Wallonia (southern region of the Belgian federal state).
>  request_addition = ISO 639-1 and ISO 639-2
>  2_code_suggestion = wa
>  3_code_suggestion = wln
>  submit_name = Lorint HENDSCHEL
>  submit_email = [log in to unmask]
>  submit_status = Speaker.
>  Writer.
>  Teacher (night school for adults).
>  Linguist (doctorate in linguistics in progress at the Universiti
> catholique de Louvain, Wallonia, Belgium)
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
January 2021
November 2020
June 2020
May 2019
February 2019
September 2018
April 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
May 2016
April 2016
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager