To JAC voting members,
Please vote on the following within 15 April 2002:
The question is whether each of the organizations below shall be invited to
appoint a "liaison officer" to participate on the JAC email list.
************************************
Foundation for Endangered Languages, Bath, England, http://www.ogmios.org/:
[ ] I am in favour of giving "liaison status" to this organization.
[ ] I am opposed to giving "liaison status" to this organization.
************************************
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), http://www.ietf.org/, in particular
RFC 3066, http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt, see also
http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-tags/:
[ ] I am in favour of giving "liaison status" to this organization.
[ ] I am opposed to giving "liaison status" to this organization.
************************************
Linguasphere, Wales, http://www.linguasphere.org/:
[ ] I am in favour of giving "liaison status" to this organization.
[ ] I am opposed to giving "liaison status" to this organization.
************************************
Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania,
http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/:
[ ] I am in favour of giving "liaison status" to this organization.
[ ] I am opposed to giving "liaison status" to this organization.
************************************
SIL International, Dallas TX, http://www.sil.org/ (and Ethnologue,
http://www.ethnologue.com/):
[ ] I am in favour of giving "liaison status" to this organization.
[ ] I am opposed to giving "liaison status" to this organization.
************************************
Ballot submitted by:
- - - - -
Best regards,
Håvard Hjulstad
|