I did, in fact, mean ResponseSchemas. Are you saying that you no longer
need data returned in the response other than the hit count, status, result
set ID and the records? If you don't want the query echoed, the current
record number returned or any of the other bells and whistles that you
wanted previously, then the difference between SRU and SRW is just protocol.
Ralph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theo van Veen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:27 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Betr.: SRW Requirements
>
>
> >>> [log in to unmask] 23-04-02 21:49 >>>
> >
> > <RecordSchemas>
> > <Schema name=DC urn=www.dcmi.org/dc/schema default=true\>
> > <Schema name=MODS urn=www.loc.gov/marc/mods.xsd>
> > </Schemas>
> >
> >The SRU folks will want a similar list of supported ResponseSchemas.
> >
> >Ralph
>
> I assume you mean recordSchemas?
> How many SRU folks are there?
> I would prefer not to make a distinction between SRU and SRW
> on this item.
>
> How about brief or full records? I assume that this will be
> different recordSchemas e.g. DC and DC_BRIEF or something like that.
> People are starting to make use of application profiles. I
> assume that DC will mean "all the application profiles based on DC"?
> I am concerned about the different ways application profiles
> will be implemented in XML. I know of some guidelines but DC
> does not specify how to use qualifiers in XML. The dot
> notation is for HTML.
>
> Theo
>
|