>>>> [log in to unmask] 16-05-02 19:36 >>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Theo van Veen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:32 AM
>> SRU and SRW should remain as much as possible identical.
>> There is no need to make a distinction between SRU and SRW
>> because in SRU one can do the same as in SRW by means of XSL
>Does this mean that the entire discussion of unprefixed indexes has been
>pointless because the clients could always have put a prefix on them?