> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Kent [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:06 PM
>
> 1. bath.authorWord (can be used with relation(?) and
> truncation operators)
>
> Attribute Type Attribute Values Attribute Names
> -------------- ---------------- ---------------
> Use (1) 1003 author
> Relation (2) 3 equals
> Position (3) 3 any position in field
> Structure (4) 2 word
> Truncation (5) 100 do not truncate
> Completeness (6) 1 incomplete subfield
I understand that this is much more in line with the explicit intent of the
Bath Profile folks, but I don't like it. Specifically, I don't want the
truncation rules to change from index to index.
Besides, I don't believe the intent of the Bath Profile was to prohibit
truncation, just to define a type of search that did not require it.
Ralph
|