On Thu, 16 May 2002, Mike Taylor wrote:
> > From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>

> > > I think Theo's point is that we're talking about access points
> > > that don't belong to any community -- or, if you prefer, the "no
> > > community" community.  I agree with him that we should provide a
> > Then why expand it to Qualified Dublin Core which self evidently
> > does have a community?
> Who said owt about _qualified_ DC?  Not I, anyway.

See the underlined bit in my previous reply.  I could be misreading it on
the other hand, but to paraphrase it was something like:

I think we should use as much as possible the elements from dublin core
profile_s_. [emphasis mine]

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Twin Cathedrals:  telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.              WWW:  http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I