"Larry E. Dixson" wrote:

> Ray,
>    1) keyword
>    2) keyword with right truncation
> ....
> Can't they be represented as (where "x" is a particular index like
> "title"):
>    1) bath.xWord     (no truncation character required in search term)
>    2) bath.xWord     (include "?" at end or term --  the "*" is a bonus)

But Bath specifies right truncation -- truncation value 1. We would have to use a
truncation value of 104 if we put the truncation character in the string.

If we specify a truncation value different than Bath, can we call it a Bath search?

Then (1) and (2) above would be the same index, representing two different bath
searches.  (We lose the correspondence of srw indexes to Bath searches.) Is this a
good thing to do?

--Ray