> > But it doesn't. Not the one at
> > http://www.lib.ox.ac.uk/jafer/zng/zng-p1.wsdl.html
> > which is the current file (isn't it?) It just points to a schema.
> It is the current file at present -
No, actually http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/wsdl.xml
the January 28 version is current. Please use that one to update.
> I did ask the list for a summary of
> any decisions made at the April ZIG as to any revisions I need to put in
The only necessary revision I can think of now is to remove the
responseSchema parameter from the request.
> > Can't the wsdl define the response rather than point to a schema?
> The WSDL can include the response rather than point to it - but in both
> cases the response is defined by an XML Schema (whether embedded in the
> WSDL or pointed to). Having a separate document is one of the WSDL
> authoring styles and in any case means that the Response schema can be
> imported into non-WSDL compliant tools easily enough for use in say SRU
Ok, that's fine with me.