> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:41:57 -0400
> From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
> suppose the request is a present against an
> existing result set, that is the query string is
> just the result set id. As we discussed the
> server could choose to create a new (identical)
> result set, but also could choose not to.
We can't prevent servers from doing this (after all, how could we tell
if they did) but surely we must discourage such profligate behaviour.
> In the
> latter case. it would return the same resultSetId,
> same value for numberOfRecords, an optional
> updated ttl?
Whatever the server does in the privacy of its own address space, the
client musy surely see that it's getting back records from the same
result set as last time. That's the whole point.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ Interchicken -- Say it with domesticated edible avians!