> You mean like the XML format Eliot and I came up with for Type-101 queries
> (see http://www.gils.net/search.html)?
Like that yes. But not so complex as we don't need <relation> and
<semantic> and <NameOfAttributeIJustInventedOffTheTopOfMyHead> etc.
Take current CQL and wrap appropriate XML tags around the various bits in
it.
Rob
--
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
|