thank you - i was about to make the same point - it may be that some of
them don't make any sense but the ones that do should be a subset of the
current ones - that will certainly make gateways easier
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
> Why won't they just be z39.50 diagnostics? We've got no interoperability
> otherwise. If we need to add new ones to z39.50, then that's fine. But
> let's not just start over with a new set.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 12:04 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: diagnostics
> > Robert Sanderson wrote:
> > > (Is there a list of SR[WU] diagnostics somewhere, by the way?)
> > No. If everyone will send me their favorites I'll start a list.