> Why won't they just be z39.50 diagnostics? We've got no interoperability
> otherwise. If we need to add new ones to z39.50, then that's fine. But
> let's not just start over with a new set.
So will the soap Fault code be something like, in SOAP 1.1:
<Envelope>
<Body>
<Fault>
<faultcode>z39.50:6</faultcode>
<faultstring>Too many boolean operators</faultstring>
</Fault>
</Body>
</Envelope>
The faultcode value has to be a qualified name. Which means that we also
need a namespace for z39.50 diagnostics, and SRW diagnostics. (As far as I
understand it)
(And of course is different in SOAP 1.2)
Rob
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
|