Or even ask for no records from the result set!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LeVan,Ralph [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 9:23 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: TTL
> If it is an idle timeout, then just fetch the first record in the result
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:57 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: TTL
> > Is there a no operation that can be done by clients to keep
> > sessions/resultsets alive? For example I'm in the middle of
> > some nice set
> > of queries but get called away to a meeting for 15 minutes.
> > Could my client be instructed to artificially keep the
> > session active by
> > sending pings that don't require the server to do anything apart from
> > keep the resultsets/session alive?
> > See also the NOOP instruction in FTP.
> > Rob
> > On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Ray Denenberg wrote:
> > > I've always assumed it's a relative time -- not an
> > absolute time, but not an
> > > idle time either.
> > > TTL wouldn't be the right thing to call it if it's an idle
> > time, however, idle
> > > time is fine with me (let's just call it "idle time"). --Ray
> > >
> > > "LeVan,Ralph" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've always assumed that the TTL was an idle time, not an
> > absolute time.
> > > > I'm promising that I'll keep your result set for 300
> > seconds after the last
> > > > time you've referenced it. Reference it again and you'll
> > get another 300
> > > > seconds. Does everyone agree with that?
> > > >
> > > > Ralph
> > >
> > --
> > ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> > ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> > ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> > ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet:
> > liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
> > ____/:::::::::::::. WWW:
> I L L U M I N A T I