> We've also tentatively decided to include an
> explicit resultSetId in the request. Should the
> request be allowed to include a sortKey in this
> case? I.e. a request to sort an existing result

So no query, resultset is set and sort is set, meaning apply the sort to
the result set. Sounds pretty good to me.

Rob

--
      ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I