Same service is fine, it doesn't need to be in CQL.
From: Ray denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 June 2002 22:03
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: result set model for srw
From: "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]>
> Right, but it doesn't need to be in CQL, it could be an parameter in the
> XML request and still be presented at the same time as the search.
I think that's what she meant. (Re-reading, she said cql as opposed to a
"separate service" but I think she meant srw as opposed to a separate