Ralph

thank you - i was about to make the same point - it may be that some of
them don't make any sense but the ones that do should be a subset of the
current ones - that will certainly make gateways easier

mark


On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, LeVan,Ralph wrote:

> Why won't they just be z39.50 diagnostics?  We've got no interoperability
> otherwise.  If we need to add new ones to z39.50, then that's fine.  But
> let's not just start over with a new set.
>
> Ralph
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 12:04 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: diagnostics
> >
> >
> > Robert Sanderson wrote:
> >
> > > (Is there a list of SR[WU] diagnostics somewhere, by the way?)
> >
> > No. If everyone will send me their favorites I'll start a list.
> >
>