> > > (5) Do we really want:
> > > "nobath"."all" relevance zing!1"for"-you
> > But I agree, 'relevance' is weird. Fuzzy and stem make more sense.
> Can't say I follow all this and I would be happy to remove Relevance is nobody
> objects.

Objection.

We use relevance all the time for full text searches.  Not so useful for
Marc records, but we're not talking about marc records, we're talking
about XML records.  There should IMO be a way to say that the results
should be relevance ranked.

Rob


--
      ,'/:.          Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Twin Cathedrals:  telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.              WWW:  http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I