Mike Taylor wrote:
> Then these misbegotten piles of bits are simply not worthy to be
> called SRW servers, surely? We are _defining_ the protocol here.
> Let's not give up on getting it right before we've even started.
May I infer from your recent postings, the increasing frequency and
intensity, that you're now jumping on the bandwagon and planning to
implement? So maybe you'll reconsider and come to the July meeting?