You mean like the XML format Eliot and I came up with for Type-101 queries
(see http://www.gils.net/search.html)?

Matthew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: 17 June 2002 17:24
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Betr.: Re: result set model for srw
> 
> 
> Robert Sanderson wrote:
> 
> > ....   If the query isn't to be encoded in XML (which
> > I assume that it won't) then at least make it typable.  If it's not 
> > typable, why not make it XML which is easier to parse?
> 
> Rob -- Just want to be sure I understand what you're 
> suggesting.  By "make it XML" do you mean come up with an XML 
> schema for cql, or do you mean move to an existing xml-based 
> query syntax, though I don't know what that would be -- W3C XQUERY?
> 
> Ray
>