> Aaaaagh! - SRW is suppose to be about defining an on the wire protocol *NOT*
> a user query language (IMHO). These are different endeavours (albeit
> admittedly related). I suspect basing CQL on CCL is causing more confusion
> here.
> the SRU case). If that query language wants human assigned/human readable
> names for result sets fine - but the client is responsible for resolving
> these to the server assigned result set id's when it passes over the wire.


Then you agree that we should have an XML based query structure rather
than a simple string as that is what we're passing over the wire? =)

Rob


--
      ,'/:.          Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Twin Cathedrals:  telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.              WWW:  http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I