On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Ray Denenberg wrote:
> Robert Sanderson wrote:
> > Could we relax it to triples after the first?
> That's what I suggested, and the consensus was no. Even though more
> intuitive, it adds too much complexity both to describe and to parse.
> At least, that's what everyone said.
I'm not particularly fussed either way. It's not that hard to simply check
if the query needs brackets round it and add them before sending. It
comes back to human /writable/ CQL or not, which wasn't on my mind at the
time as we were discussing in the context of machine parsing.
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I