> 2. The <records> definition does not allow for surrogate diagnostics?
> It should be a sequence of <record> or <diagnostic> right, rather than
> a sequence of just <record>?
After Ray has now updated the WSDL files, I think this is the only one
that still stands of the three.
> Otherwise, is the following representative of what SRW query and response
> should look like? And what should the xsi:type for each non atomic
> element be?
This question still stands as well :)
A page on the site with fully qualified examples would be very useful.
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I