> 2. The <records> definition does not allow for surrogate diagnostics?
>    It should be a sequence of <record> or <diagnostic> right, rather than
> a sequence of just <record>?

After Ray has now updated the WSDL files, I think this is the only one
that still stands of the three.


> Otherwise, is the following representative of what SRW query and response
> should look like?  And what should the xsi:type for each non atomic
> element be?

This question still stands as well :)

A page on the site with fully qualified examples would be very useful.

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Twin Cathedrals:  telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.              WWW:  http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I