> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:27:18 -0400
> From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > but the last time I looked, we were using names like
> > "titleWords".
>
> Sorry for the lack of movement; "titleWord" is out of date and as
> soon as I see that we have a clear direction (which I think we're
> converging on) I'm going to re-write the dc indexes, which may
> include:
> dc.titleAllTheseWords
> dc.titleAnyOfTheseWords
> dc.titleAdjacentWords
> dc.titleRelevantWords
> dc.titleString
>
> I don't think dc.titleWord will be one of these.

OK, but my point still pertains: the semantics of these qualifiers are
perfectly clear to anyone with half a brain.  No-one who can't figure
out what they're supposed to mean has any business trying to implement
an IR protocol.

Anyway, I'm going to let this drop now.  It still seems to me that the
document will be quietly filed in people's Never Read This folder, and
I'm trying to save you wasting time in writing it; but it looks like
you're determined, so I shall quietly step aside and hope that I'm
wrong.

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor   <[log in to unmask]>   www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "Specifications are for the weak and timid!" -- Klingon
         Programming Mantra