> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:30:24 -0400
> From: "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
> > I honestly do not imagine that one single person in the whole
> > world will look at this document in order to understand the
> > semantics of a CQL qualifier.
> I've got an ItletayOrdsWay index and I'd sure like for clients to
> know that is contains words from title fields. I don't think the
> name of the index helped much.
Your point would carry more weight if we in fact intended to define
CQL's Dublin Core qualifier-set (or the Bath set) with names like
ItletayOrdsWay -- but the last time I looked, we were using names like
> I'm tired of hoping that black magic is going to make things work
I hear you. I feel your pain, cat. It's just that the current work
is not actually going to _solve_ that problem for anyone.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "One generation's 'amusing dreck' is the next generation's
high literature. ('I think the anvil landing on the coyote's
head symbolizes ...')" -- Bill Cameron.