> > > 2. The <records> definition does not allow for surrogate diagnostics?
> > > It should be a sequence of <record> or <diagnostic> right, rather
> > > than a sequence of just <record>?
> This is briefly described in the service definition. A surrogate
> diagnostic is encoded as
> <record>
> <recordSchema>http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srwu/wsdl/zing_types.
> xsd:diagnosticType</recordSchema>
> <recordData>...
Ahh. Fair enough. Easier to have diagnostics wrapped than a choice in the
sequence, but means that the diagnostics section needs to be treated
differently to surrogate diagnostics.
Rob
--
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
|