Schemas and index sets are the only things I can think of.
Index sets so that you can point to some document that gives the semantics
of the indexes in the index set. Those semantics will be common across all
SRW/U users of the index set. It would be nice if that semantic description
were machine readable, at some point. But, not with this release. Human
readable text will be just fine for now.
Ralph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:59 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: uri udentifiers
>
>
> Robert Sanderson wrote:
>
> > The namespace discussion was about 2 or 3 weeks ago when
> Ray announced
> > that he was going to get a new area of webspace and what
> should it be
> > called. Then from there, the desire to separate namespaces
> from the web
> > pages in a structured directory tree, but have them point
> to something
> > readable.
>
> Someone please list all of the objects that need URIs for identifiers.
> Schemas for one, but what else? Someone mentioned indexes,
> e.g. the DC index
> needs a uri (why?) What else?
>
> When I know this better, I'll come up with a specific proposal.
>
> --Ray
>
|