On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Janifer Gatenby wrote:
> xsort: perhaps move the examples. There was one message where Rob proposed
> changing startRecord to recordPosition (or something). I don't see a need
> for this change, but won't mind terribly.
No no :) It was change recordNumber to recordPosition, to be consistent
with nextRecordPosition.
Also it's more clear that this is the position in the result set, not
some arbitrary number that's associated with the record somehow.
But I'm not fussed either way, just seems a little more consistent.
R
> Revised to do list:
>
> * Diagnostics list has reverted again to the old one.
> * Diagnostics example needs updating to new codes
> * XCQL to go under SRW, not CQL
> * XCQL element guide update for operands
> * Namespaces to change accordingly
> * Prose to describe XCQL == SOAP CQL not XML CQL
> * SOAP samples updated for operands and types
> * Sort Definition table has no borders, hard to read
> * explain-docs.html link on splain-record.html still broken
> * CQL sample queries could do with a prefix example or three
>
> * Final decision on XML Fragment vs Structure.
--
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
|