Sorry if I haven't followed this too closely. I assume there's nothing going
on that requires any last minute changes?
--Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: SRU
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Adam Dickmeiss wrote:
> > To me, the encoding methods are more different than meets the eye.
>
> Yep.
>
> I'm happy for the page on SRU to say that 'implementation experience will
> help us judge whether strings or XML fragments are the right choice or
> strings' but lets not have any 11th hour changes again, when we don't know
> the repercussions.
>
> It's been strings for weeks now. They're still processable, just not the
> entire response via XSLT. I'm confident that it could be done in
> Javascript though, perhaps not with XSLT though but who knows.
> It needs implementation experience.
>
> Rob
>
> --
> ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
> ____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
> I L L U M I N A T I
|