> Given that qualifiers come from namespaces and the chance of accidental
> name collision because of case insensitivity are nearly zero, I would
> vote for case insensitivity.
Yep.
I believe that we decided on case insensitivity in the past for this
reason, plus a motifying example of a user who gets back a diagnostic when
they type in bath.dateofPublication rather than dateOfPublication.
> > Since there is some question about the index name, I've set my
> > servers up to support resultSet, resultSetName, resultSetId and
> I'm pretty certain we agreed on this list that qualifier names were
> case-insensitive, so this last distinction should not arise.
Yep.
And a list archive URL would be appreciated, or even better a raw copy of
all the messages (so I can index them and put up a search engine for them
similar to z3950://gondolin.hist.liv.ac.uk/mailarchive //
http://www.o-r-g.org/~cheshire/cheshire-l/ )
Rob
--
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
|