What is - besides introducing XMLrecordData - the exact proposal?
Theo
>>> [log in to unmask] 03-12-02 15:30 >>>
> Does having two different parameters solve the problem and doesn't it
> re-introduce the problem that caused choosing string for recordData?
The problem with XMLFragment is that if any of the XML records are broken
it may destroy the entire response. This is still a problem, but the
trade off is that you can do the whole thing in XSLT.
> 1. SRW client and server: string only
Hell no. I want to be able to use XML as well under SRW.
> 3. SRU client and SRW server: server translates string to XML
> 4. SRW client and SRU server: client accepts XML. Is this a possible combination?
Won't work at all as the access mechanisms are completely different.
Rob
--
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
|