> recordPosition vs recordNumber was changed (on Rob's request) a few
> weeks ago before the spec was "stable"!
Ahh. Goodo. I didn't take note of when this was done, I've always just
been running interops against Adam's server.
> The type issues as regards startRecord, maximumRecords etc. are
> negligible a non-negative integer is still an integer (and the
> supporting text rules out negative values anyway) i.e. compliance to the
But the serialisation of these is different. For example the quick
SOAP::Lite perl code on Adam's site doesn't work with them as it sends
integer regardless of the WSDL, as far as I can tell.
So I reject it because it's sending the wrong type of integer.
> As regards the SOAP array question the spec says "array of record"
> nothing there about it being a SOAP-ENC:array of record!
As WS-I in their wisdom has ruled out using Arrays, we should be honest
and say on the service definition page exactly what the types are.
Rob
--
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
|