I suppose you have understood that it was an error in my previous vote for
Ingush, (I pasted the text of Dargwa)
Please find below the correct vote :
ISO 639 Ballot -- New item: Ingush
Please vote by Friday 2003-01-24.
Please see additional information below the ballot form.
Submitted by (your name, please):Anila Angjeli
(A) -- Inclusion:
_X__ I am in favour of including the individual language "Ingush" in 639-2
___ I am opposed to including the individual language "Ingush" in 639-2
(B) -- Identifier:
(Please vote even if you are opposed to the inclusion of the item)
_X_ I accept the alpha-3 identifier "inh" for Ingush (if to be included)
___ I do not accept the identifier "inh" -- Comment:
(C) -- Language names:
_X_ I accept the English name "Ingush" (if to be included)
___ I do not accept the English name "Ingush" -- Comment:
_X_ I accept the French name "ingouche" (if to be included)
___ I do not accept the French name "ingouche" -- Comment:
_X_ I accept the indigenous name "ghalghajn" (if to be included)
___ I do not accept the indigenous name "ghalghajn" -- Comment:
I propose to add also another variant of the indigenous name "galgay"[with dot
under each g] - "Les langues du monde" reffers to as "the indigenous name" of
* * * * * * *
Background and additional information:
This is based on a proposal submitted on 2002-10-11 and circulated to the
JAC for comments on 2002-10-30.
Please note that the proposed identifier is identical with the Ethnologue
identifier, but that it is NOT based on the indigenous name of the language.
(Potential identifiers like "gha" and "gal" are available.)
The source of the French name is http://www.eurominority.org
I consider it as correct
The source of the indigenous name is http://www.evertype.com/alphabets/