Robert Sanderson wrote:
> Also, I think that a ZIG would be a good place to spread the word as the
> audience is most likely to be receptive. Somewhere in Europe in
> March/April ? Regardless of Z39.50 not needing the face to face meetings,
> I think that the ZING projects /do/ need them, and if it's advertised as a
> ZIG then it's more likely that people will attend.
But the fact is that we can't have a ZIG meeting without articulating a reason
to have it. If ZING is the reason to have it, ok, but we need to be up front
about that, and there may be some ZIG folks who would object. If someone
wants to kick this idea around on the ZIG list, please feel free. An
alternative is to simply have a ZING meeting; it could be open to everyone. We
could have a private implementor meeting before or after.
What are the timing considerations? 1.0 was released late November; six
months is late May (9 months is late August). Should we plan something around
the release of 1.1 or should it be part of the development of 1.1?