I recall some text in the original service spec that Ray drafted after
the July meet which covered the result set model and hence these points.

Matthew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: 14 January 2003 16:06
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: ResultSet refreshing
> 
> 
> I've done the same as Ralph.
> I think that this should be noted on the resultSets page, in 
> particular c as being not obvious what to do?
> 
> Rob
> 
> > > When is a server expected to refresh the idle time on a 
> result set?
> > > a)  Create a new result set
> > Obviously.
> > > b)  Present out of a single existing result set
> > Yes, but I'm not returning the result set info again.  The 
> definition 
> > of the idle time says that it gets reset, so I don't think 
> I need to 
> > tell them that.
> > > c)  Combine an existing result set with a new search
> > Nope.  The old set wasn't touched.
> 
> --
>       ,'/:.          Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
>     ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
>   ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::.    Twin Cathedrals:  telnet: 
> liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
> ____/:::::::::::::.              WWW:  
> http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
> I L L U M I N A T I
>